The
Loudoun County General Plan (1991)
Location: Loudoun
County, Virginia (Dulles International Airport area)
Issue: growth pressure
Tools Used: visioning, public
meetings/hearings, open forums,
workshops,
surveys
Result: Choices and
Changes, the Countys new General Plan (1994 APA award winner for
communities under 100,000)
Process:
Loudoun County is located
adjacent to Fairfax County in northern Virginia and contains
Washington Dulles International Airport. The County had experienced
tremendous growth pressures throughout the 1980's and the
comprehensive plan it had adopted in 1979 was in need of updating and
rethinking. Local preservationists felt development was out of control
and local developers believed they were under attack. Everybody wanted
a new plan - although for different reasons.
A sense of urgency prompted
County government to create a vision for its future that would resolve
some of these conflicts and concerns. County planning staff developed
a vision that would re-capture the County's historic development
patterns in the rural areas (hamlets and villages surrounded by farms)
and absorb new urban development in compact, traditional towns
(narrow, connected streets, human-scale architecture, etc.).
The planners vision was
embraced by the Board of Supervisors and well-received by the general
public, but when the Board hurriedly attempted to implement the
planning concepts through changes to the zoning ordinance in late
1988, backlash from landowners was extraordinary. They feared the new
rules would be too restrictive and would cause the recent rapid
increases in their land values to decline with equal rapidity.
So the County had to start
over, using a planning process that was "bottom up" rather
than "top down". The formal public participation process
began in early 1990 and continued through September 1991 when the new
General Plan, "Choices and Changes" was adopted.
The goals of the General Plan
process were twofold:
The process used to prepare
the new General Plan might be called "trials, tribulations and
satisfaction." It included over 100 public meetings, in addition
to numerous drafts and re-drafts of policies, action programs and plan
maps. The Board of Supervisors was primarily responsible for the
process, while the County Planning Department and other
development-related agencies were responsible for the technical
aspects of plan development. Staff prepared policy ideas in text and
graphic form, and then held work sessions with appointed and elected
officials as well as citizen groups to refine those ideas. This
process was repeated numerous times in order to steadily work toward
consensus on a broad range of complex and innovative policies and
action recommendations.
Public input during the
planning process shaped the plan that was finally adopted. This
included a written survey on planning issues, mailed to every postal
patron (4,000 citizens responded); eight public forums (attended by
250 people); Planning Commission work sessions and public hearings;
and a series of Round Table Forums with special interest group
representatives.
The basic policies of this
General Plan are similar to the original "vision" ideas
created by the staff in 1988, but because they were reached through a
process of involvement, discussion, debate and ferment, they are more
refined, more practical, and more acceptable to the general public and
to key interest groups.
The Planning Commission
certified its draft Plan to the Board of Supervisors in mid-1991. The
Board adopted the Plan on September 17, 1991. In 1994, the General
Plan was selected by the American Planning Association as the best new
plan in the United States for jurisdictions of less than 100,000
people. (When the General Plan was adopted, Loudoun had less than
90,000 people. It now has over 125,000).
Lessons Learned:
Don't
rush to action. If you choose to rush new planning ideas into
adopted regulations, be prepared for a backlash from citizens who may
become suspicious of a hurried effort.
Be
inclusive. When the stakes are high and change is rapid, there is
a temptation to rush and to make "top-down" policy
decisions. This is the very time to be patient and to include all of
the "stakeholders" in the process, so that the outcome -
whatever it is - enjoys the broadest possible support. Broad support
will tend to allow for more successful implementation in the long
term.
Be
patient. Being inclusive means also having to be patient. It takes
time and effort to really allow people to participate and to
incorporate their input into the final results.
Take
some risks and be creative. Don't make policy decisions based
simply upon "more of the same". Make an effort to create
appropriate solutions to problems, even if it means breaking new
ground.
It's never
too late. There is always enough time to do good planning and to
make good, long term decisions. It's a lot more efficient than rushing
into bad decisions and having to do things over.
Contact:
Milton Herd