Contact:
     uap@vt.edu

 


Neighborhood Planning in Hampton 

Location: Hampton, Virginia

Issue: comprehensive planning, neighborhood/small area planning

Tools Used: stakeholder groups, public meetings

Result:  “healthy neighborhoods” and a “collaborative culture”

Process:

Hampton's attempt to "reinvent" local government in the mid-1980s was driven by a combination of fiscal constraints facing the community and a growing sense of detachment, dissatisfaction, and distrust of local government by Hampton citizens. During a series of community “town meetings” on a draft Comprehensive Plan update, citizens made it very clear that the planning staff was “out of touch” with the views of its citizens, especially on transportation and open space issues. 

Former City Manager Bob O'Neill, Assistant City Manager Mike Monteith, and former Planning Director Joan Kennedy initiated conversations to explore how we might alter our approach and view this apparent negative situation as an opportunity. They decided to try some innovative methods of participatory planning and collaborative problem solving, a shift from “top-down” to “bottoms-up” policy formulation. Community leaders and the City Council were approached with the idea of placing the responsibility of formulating the city's new Comprehensive Plan with a group of eighteen community stakeholders, one of which would be local government. If successful, this experiment would serve as a model for more far reaching change in the relationship between local government and grass roots community organizations. 

After eighteen months of intense work, the stakeholder group presented a consensus update to the city's Comprehensive Plan to both the Planning Commission and City Council. In excess of 90% of its recommendations were adopted by the City Council, including recommendations to address the transportation and open space issues that had created such controversy two years earlier. 

Hampton’s current neighborhood planning process was a direct outgrowth of that Comprehensive Plan update. Citizens remarked that as good as the new Comprehensive Plan was, the “one size fits all" philosophy didn’t respect the unique and diverse range of neighborhoods that make up Hampton. This rather simple recognition provided the framework for future development of Hampton’s overall neighborhood initiative. 

By 1993, the “first generation” neighborhood plans had been completed using a 7-14 member stakeholder group, supported by staff and other resources. Each neighborhood committee identified issues, conducted research, and formulated draft strategies, and then held 3-5 community "checkpoint" meetings to assess their work. The entire planning process, from start to finish, spanned a period of between six and eighteen months depending on the breadth and complexity of issues. 

Soon the demand for neighborhood planning exceeded local government resources: even if Hampton had the resources to facilitate a neighborhood planning effort, few resources existed to help the community implement the plan once it was complete. To address these challenges the City created the Neighborhood Office in 1993, which it charged with coordinating the neighborhood planning initiative and increasing the capacity of both local government and the community to engage in collaborative partnerships.  

While the focus of early neighborhood plans was almost exclusively on physical issues (i.e. housing, drainage, transportation land use, community facilities, etc.), the new expectation -- “healthy neighborhoods” -- was for these grass roots planning efforts to address a much broader sphere of social and civic issues. The Hampton Neighborhood Task Force, a diverse mix of schools, social services, public safety, parks and recreation, public works, housing authority, youth agencies, planning, and others, was established to serve as the local government partner in Hampton’s Healthy Neighborhood Initiative.    

Objectives of  Hampton’s Healthy Neighborhoods Initiative 

1.  Help facilitate the formulation of strategic direction and priorities for Hampton's neighborhoods.
2.  Assist in the development of neighborhood assets.
3. Provide opportunities to buld capacity within neighborhoods to:
n         More effectively participate in local government.
n        
More effectively manage and govern their own civic and social infrastructure.
n        
Develop and maintain effective community partnerships.
4.  Provide assistance in identifying resources.
 

To date, ten neighborhood or small area plans have been completed and are in various stages of being implemented and managed. Two additional neighborhood plans are now underway. Each of these plans is formally adopted by the Hampton City Council and is incorporated into City policy documents, like the Comprehensive Plan. Neighborhood planning principles, in a variety of more streamlined formats, are being employed to address a wide variety of neighborhood based issues.

As the evolution continues, where do we find ourselves today? The most important observation is to recognize that “neighborhood planning” in Hampton is by now a misnomer: instead community groups are part of an initiative that offers a wide array of choices for shaping their future. Local government now deploys neighborhood planning teams, neighborhood implementation teams, youth planners, and an experimental area-wide service delivery team as resources to assist the community in creating their vision of what constitutes a “healthy neighborhood.”

What is unique about the Hampton experience is the pervasiveness and depth of the “collaborative culture” that now exists in local government organizations and across the community. The real challenge and expectation is to find a way to craft a true community consensus that serves as the framework for community policy. 

Contact:
Terry P. O’Neill
Director of Planning
City of Hampton

 

This site was created by the Department of Urban Affairs and Planning at Virginia Tech
in the
College of Architecture and Urban Studies
with support from the American Institute of Certified Planners.
Last updated 07/14/99